The Problem: Solving the Three-Part Puzzle

Organizations which work with persons having
disabilities and persons with disabilities
themselves often find it difficult to navigate
through three functional areas or pieces of the
accommodations puzzle. These are:
- Quantifying clinical assessments
- Developing accommodations as directly tied to
the reported disability
- Reviewing policy that guides consistent
decision making
The Example: Explaining the Problem
Access to services related to having a disability
can break down without the individual puzzle pieces
from different disabilities sectors being fit neatly
into one another. This failure is most apparent when
a person is attempting to transition between these
disabilities areas. Consider conflicts between the
below systems:
- High School vs.
College Disabilities
Complications arise when a person moves from high
school special education programming to college
enrollment. The philosophies of these two systems
drive different interpretation of a disability
definition, subsequent service eligibility and the
kinds of services offered. Where the High School
system defines students as disabled by not meeting
their “potential,” the College system typically
defines a person as being disabled when comparing
their limitations to the average person in the
general population.
- University vs.
Separate Testing and Licensing Organizations
Many college and university policies defining
disabilities and accommodations are not consistent
with the policies defining disabilities
accommodations on standardized tests. The most
common standardized tests are the GRE, GMAT, SAT,
MCAT, and BAR exams.
Consider a law student with a Learning
Disabilities diagnosis has received accommodations
throughout law school. This student may not be
considered Learning Disabled when applying for
additional time in which to take the Bar exam.
The student’s misalignment in disabilities
definitions often results from limited clinical
descriptions of the learning disorder. Often a
clinical assessment is described in terms of a
person not meeting his potential. The severity of
a condition is rarely described in terms of the
person being limited relative to the average
person in the general population.
- Therapy vs.
Medication Based Treatment
Systems vary when a person moves from
psychological treatment services to employment
provisions related to that psychological
treatment. In terms of insurance, a medicated
condition is often found as disabling and a
non-medicated condition often not considered
disabling. Therefore, what may be considered a
long-term disability meriting psychotropic
medication, may only qualify someone for basic
counseling sessions with a psychologist.
Next: Our Name |